
Bobby (2006), The Weinstein Company
Once again, I took advantage of a free screening preview offered from SIFF. This time it was Bobby, a movie about the day Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated, as told from perspective of various people who were at the Ambassador Hotel for one reason or another to witness the tragedy.
It’s a simple premise, really — the movie begins in the morning of June 6th, 1968, and it constantly switches shots between the 22 characters’ lives as it leads up to the finale of RFK getting shot in the kitchen. We see many different types of characters, each with their own set of problems. The movie basically gives us the glimpse of what it was like to live in that time, with the reality of an unpopular war staring most people in their faces. And with two of the most influential figures in recent history brutally assassinated, the all focus — and hope — was on Robert Kennedy to change the world, something his brother and Dr. King couldn’t continue to do.
We see everything through the characters’ eyes. All shots of RFK are actual clips from the 60′s, and when he is “in” the movie they obscure his face so it’s unclear who’s playing him. The point was not necessarily to tell the story of RFK, but to show that everyone was profoundly affected in their own ways by everything that happened during that era. The movie’s climax and the finale come with Kennedy getting shot and carried off to the hospital. Even though for the entire length of the movie we see these characters’ stories develop, we don’t get to see how they are affected by this particular tragedy.
That seems to be the most common criticism of the movie, that all the subplots are overshadowed by one man’s death at the end. I personally didn’t mind it that much. All that the subplots really represented was the confusion, anger, and the hope that many people felt. Rather than tidying up the meaningless details of the subplots, I appreciated that the movie ended the way it did, because it somehow drew more attention to RFK’s overall message of hope, tolerance, and demanding a little bit more from one another as we try to make the world a better place. It sounds cheesy, but that’s all it was, wasn’t it? It’s easy to see the pararell between the movie and what’s happening today. Not just Vietnam and Iraq, but the culture of divide. By bringing his message to the forefront, rather than the negative impact of the events, I think Emilio Estevez (who wrote and directed the film) was just trying to inspire us to come together and hope, like they all were ready to do with RFK as a president. Overall I liked the film. It’s a Yummy!
Some of my negatives with the film — sometimes the dialogue was kind of predictable and cheesy. I have to admit that Ashton Kutcher as a stoner/drug dealer was pretty funny, but there were too many “easy-laugh” scenes of the two campaign workers getting high and being jackasses. And oh yeah, Ashton’s character getting busted at the end seemed highly obligatory, afraid to appear like they are condoning drug use. Lindsay Lohan was average in both appearance (intended) and acting (probably not). Scenes in the kitchen with Edward (Laurence Fishburne), Miguel (Jacob Vargas), and Jose (Freddy Rodríguez) were good and engaging, but a bit heavy-handed.